نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
Field and Aims: The officers responsible for establishing urban order and discipline make decisions that are appropriate to the context of their work, which, from the perspective of observers, are discriminatory and, in general, suggest abuse among citizens. Several strategies have been implemented with the aim of limiting this authority, but the results are considered unsuccessful compared to the costs. In Iran, the activities of street-level officers controlling urban crimes and violations do not have a specific and theoretical framework, and cannot be considered subject to a specific pattern, which has caused the few measures designed to limit them to be mistakenly focused on methods that limit the authority of these individuals and expand the discourse of power and be unsuccessful. Studies also indicate that no scientific studies have been conducted in this regard in the country, so it is feared that in the absence of these studies, the tendency of managers to expand coercive approaches will increase and lead to a decrease in citizen compliance.
Method: This article, which was written using a descriptive-analytical method and based on library studies, seeks to answer the question: What are the characteristics of the officers involved in controlling urban crimes and violations? What factors affect their bias when controlling urban crimes and violations? What type of strategy is capable of addressing concerns arising from their bias?
Findings and Conclusions: It seems that, considering the situation in the country, the existence of authority is a privilege and what has created bias in control is the bias resulting from other factors, which must be addressed in order to reduce its impact, which is discussed in this article.
کلیدواژهها English