Applied criminology research

Applied criminology research

The role of intelligentization of contracts in preventing the commission of crimes related to digital currencies

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Invited Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Faculty of Humanities, Islamshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Islamshahr, Iran. (Author). Email: dr.mohamadrezadeh@gmail.com
2 Associate Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Faculty of Humanities, Fardis Branch, Islamic Azad University, Fardis, Iran. Email: rafie.barrister@gmail.com
10.22034/aqcr.2024.715538
Abstract
Field and Aims: With the growth of technology, the fields of using smart contracts have increased, however, there is a possibility of fraud and committing crimes through these contracts. Smart contracts have features such as transparency and the possibility of self-execution of smart contracts. But one of the concerns of Internet activities today is crimes that occur in modern spaces, and the capabilities of smart contracts show that it is possible to prevent these crimes.
Method: The present research was carried out with a descriptive and analytical method.
Findings and Conclusions: Prevention in two forms, punitive and non-punitive, aims to reduce the amount of delinquency, which is divided into two types of action and reaction, depending on the time of the intervention. Regarding prevention by smart contracts, although criminal prevention is necessary, but taking the necessary measures in non-criminal prevention (situational and social) is associated with better results. Smart contracts are currently vulnerable due to the technology that is used based on it. A smart contract vulnerability is an error or flaw in the smart contract code that can cause it to malfunction, change state, or move money. Finally, it should be said that smart contracts with current technology can prevent crime, but two categories of contracts, namely criminal and vulnerable contracts, may provide a platform for committing crimes. There are also basically two main types of intrusion detection systems: signature-based and anomaly-based. Therefore, it should be said that with the development of technology and identifying the vulnerable points of smart contracts, the defects of these contracts that provide the possibility and conditions for committing crimes can be resolved.
Keywords

- ابراهیمی، شهرام. (1390). جرم‌شناسی پیشگیری. جلد اول. انتشارات میزان.
- اکرمی، سام؛ اکرمی، سعیده. (1395). پیشگیری غیرکیفری در جرائم اینترنتی. کنفرانس ملی چارسوی علوم انسانی.
https://civilica.com/doc/721009/certificate/print/
- برنگی، حامد؛ راجی، فاطمه و خاصه، علی اکبر. (1399). تحلیل تحقیقات امنیت و حریم خصوصی حوزه بلاک‌چین: یک مطالعه علم سنجی. محاسبات نرم، 9 (17)، 55 – 40.
https://scj.kashanu.ac.ir/article_111451.html
- توکلی راد، رضا و طهماسبی، معصومه. (1401). بررسی چالش‌ها و مزایای پیاده‌سازی قراردادهای هوشمند مبتنی بر تکنولوژی بلاک‌چین. کنفرانس بین‌المللی پژوهش‌های مدیریت و علوم انسانی در ایران رتبه بین‌المللی، 11.
https://civilica.com/doc/1673159/
- خدائیان چگنی، ذبیح اله. (1391). بررسی تطبیقی نهادهای نظام عدالت کیفری فرانسه و ایران در مقابله با جرائم اقتصادی. مطالعات حقوقی، 4(2)، 58-31.
https://jls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_1130.html
- خسروشاهی، قدرت الله و قدمی، نسرین. (1398). تبیین محیط اجتماعی به عنوان یکی از عوامل جرم‌زا و تأثیر آن بر سبک زندگی (با تأکید بر شبکه‌های اجتماعی مجازی). پژوهش‌های حقوقی، 18(40)، 410 – 389.
https://jlr.sdil.ac.ir/article_104283.html
- جعفری، سهیل و کوشا، جعفر. (1401). هوشمندسازی پیشگیری از قاچاق کالا، جلوه‌ها و چالش‌ها. دیدگاه‌های حقوق قضایی، 27(98)، 263-193.
https://jlviews.ujsas.ac.ir/article_703725.html
- رشوندبوکانی، مهدی و ناصر، مهدی. (1398). قصد متعاملین در قراردادهای هوشمند: شرایط اعتبار و شیوه احراز آن. پژوهشنامه حقوق اسلامی، 20(49)، 300 – 271.
https://ensani.ir/fa/article/408819/
- روستایی، مهرانگیز. (1388). ارزیابی مداخله کیفری در حوزه جرائم اقتصادی. کارگاه، 2(7)، 31-6.
http://det.jrl.police.ir/article_10610.html
- صادقی، حسین و مهدی، ناصر. (1397). ملاحظاتی برای سیاستگذاری حقوقی قراردادهای هوشمند. سیاستگذاری عمومی، 4(2)، 163-143.
https://jppolicy.ut.ac.ir/article_67873.html
- صفاری، علی. (1381)، انتقادات وارده بر پیشگیری وضعی از جرم. تحقیقات حقوقی، 5(35 و 36)، 233 – 194.
https://lawresearchmagazine.sbu.ac.ir/article_56556.html
- صفری ورزرد، امیرحسین. (1401). بلاکچین و قراردادهای هوشمند: سازوکارها و کاربردها. کنفرانس بین‌المللی مدیریت، گردشگری و تکنولوژی، 4.
https://civilica.com/doc/1461078/
- کرامتی معز، هادی و بهاری غازانی، مجید. (1401). پیشگیری وضعی از جرائم در بستر رمز ارزها. مطالعات پیشگیری از جرم، 17 (63)، 167-189.
https://www.magiran.com/paper/2454885/
- کی نیا، مهدی. (1376). مبانی جرم‌شناسی. چاپ پنجم. نشر دانشگاه تهران.
- مصطفی مظفری، مهدی ناصر. (1400). نقش قراردادهای هوشمند در تثبیت حقوق مالکانه افراد. فصلنامه تحقیقات حقوقی، 24(95)، 282-259.
https://lawresearchmagazine.sbu.ac.ir/article_87133.html
- مهربانی، قربانعلی. (1401). چهارمین انقلاب صنعتی: ادغام هوش مصنوعی، بلاکچین و 5G. کنفرانس ملی پژوهش‌های سازمان و مدیریت، 4.
https://civilica.com/doc/1572379/
 
-Ahubele, B. (2022). On-Blockchain Validation Smart Contract Model on Ethereum Distributed Ledger System for Pharmaceutical Products Distribution. Journal of Computer Engineering, 23(2), 10-22.
DOI:10.9790/0661-2302021022
-Boison, D. (2022). A Framework for the Evaluation of Factors Affecting Smart Contract Adoption and Enforceability in Port Supply Chain Industry in Ghana. Theories and Applications, 13, 957-969.
https://vbn.aau.dk/en/publications/a-framework-for-the-evaluation-of-factors-affecting-smart-contrac
- Cassano, J. (2016). What are Smart Contracts? Crypto currency ‘s Killer App. Fast Company. Online website accessible from,
https://www.fastcompany.com/3035723/smart-contracts-could-be-cryptocurrencys-killer-app
-Chishti, M. S., Sufyan, F., Amit, B. (2021). Decentralized On-Chain Data Access via Smart Contracts in Ethereum Blockchain. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, 9(1), 174 - 187.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSM.2021.3120912
-Crowley, D. Max. (2013). Building Efficient Crime Prevention Strategies Considering the Economics of Investing in Human Development. Criminology & Public Policy, 12(2), 353–366.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4137908/
-George, W., Tareq, A. (2023). Review of Blockchain Applications in Food Supply Chains. Blockchains, 1(1), 34-57;
https://doi.org/10.3390/blockchains1010004
-Jin, L., , Yinzhi, C., Yan, C., Simone,  C. (2022). EXGEN: Cross-platform, Automated Exploit Generation for Smart Contract Vulnerabilities. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 20(1), 650-664. https://doi.org/10.1109/TDSC.2022.3141396
-Jiang, Z.T. (2023). A Practical Detection and Defense Scheme Against Smart Contract Attacks Based on Transaction Features. Mobile Internet Security, 280-291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4430-9_21
-Konate, K., Ndiaye, M. (2023). Anomaly Detection Algorithm Based on Smart Contracts Behaviours in Ethereum Ecosystem. International Conference on Electrical, Computer, Communications and Mechatronics Engineering (ICECCME).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10252520
-Lifeng, Z., Yilei, W., Fengyin, L., Yuemei, H., and Man, H. A. (2019). A game-theoretic method based on q-learning to invalidate criminal smartcontracts. Information Sciences, 498, 144-153.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.05.061
-Levy, Karen, E. C. (2017). Blockchain-Based Smart Contracts and The Social Workings of Law. Engaging Science Technology and Society, 3 (2017), 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2017.107
-Singh, A. (2018). What is an oracle, How Oracles connect Smart contracts to the real world?. Online website accessible from,
https://www.blockchainsemantics.com/blog/oracle-connects-smart-contracts- to-real-world
-Munawar, M. (2022). The Legality of Smart Contract in the Perspectives of Indonesian Law and Islamic Law. Al-ISTINBATH Jurnal Hukum Islam, 7(1).
http://dx.doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v7i1.4140
-Namasudra, S., Akkaya, K. (2023). Introduction to Blockchain Technology. Journal Studies in Big Data Blockchain and its Applications in Industry, 4,1-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8730-4_1
-Riikka, K. (2016). Blockchains and Online Dispute Resolution: Smart Contracts as an Alternative to Enforcement. Scripted, 13(1), 40.
https://script-ed.org/?p=2669
-Singh, A., Kushwaha, S., Joshi, D., Singh, H.N. L. (2022). Systematic Review of Security Vulnerabilities in Ethereum Blockchain Smart Contract. IEEE Access, (99), 1-16.
DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3140091
-Yilei, W., Andrea, B., Tao, L., Fengyin, L., Xinchun, C., and Minghao, Z. (2019). Randomness invalidates criminal smart contracts. Information Sciences, 477, 291-301.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2018.10.057

  • Receive Date 29 June 2024
  • Revise Date 23 August 2024
  • Accept Date 05 September 2024
  • First Publish Date 05 September 2024
  • Publish Date 23 September 2023